Friday, April 27, 2012

IRONEATERS screens tomorrow at old Film unit, Lagos; 3pm. FREE Entry


We cordially invite you to the Film-Club Screening of 'IRONEATERS', directed by Shaheen Dill-Riaz, 2009, Germany. Duration: 85 min (OV with English subtitles)

 DATE: Saturday, April 28, 2012,

 TIME: 3 pm

 VENUE: Nigerian Film Corporation Lagos Branch, Old Film Unit, opp. Ikoyi Cemetery, Ikoyi, Lagos

 Free entrance!

 It is the continuation of the Monthly Screening collaboration between the iREP Documentary Film Forum and Goethe Institut, Lagos.

 About the Film:
 Every year, the ebb and flow of the Ganges floodplain leaves farmers in northern Bangladesh in need of employment to help them survive the yearly droughts. Many of them travel hundreds of miles south to the shores of Chittagong to labor in one of Bangladesh's most prosperous industries, dismantling colossal ships and tankers — the discards of the developed world — for scrap iron. Director Shaheen Dill-Riaz's documentary confronts us with an elaborate system of exploitation and dependence. Especially the ones that do the most dangerous and hardest work, got into a hopeless debt trap, that only few can escape.

 We hope to see you there! 
 Kind regards,  

Kim Docter 
Intern Programme Department
Goethe-Institut NigeriaGerman Cultural Centre Lagos
City Hall, Catholic Mission Street opposite Holy Cross Cathedral
Lagos IslandLagos
+234 (0)1 7746888Mobile: +234(0)8026618287 
Email: intern@lagos.goethe.org 
www.goethe.de/nigeria 


Lanre OluponaIREP13, Oguntona Street, Gbagada Phase 11, Lagos
08051702004 (sms only)
lanreolupona@hotmail.com
www.irepfilmfestival.com





www.irepfilmfestival.com 3 Oguntona Crescent, Gbagada Phase 1, Lagos Nigeria. P.O. Box 36 Surulere. T: +234 803 425 1963, +234 802 201 6495, +234 803 403 0646 E: info@irepfilmfestival.com

Saturday, April 14, 2012

Unveiling IREP 2012: Short reviews of all the films and activities



THE GUARDIAN on SUNDAY, 01 APRIL 2012 00:00 EDITOR SUNDAY MAGAZINE ARTS
Freedom   
The 2012 edition of the annual iREPRESENT International Documentary Film Festival ended its four-day run in Lagos last Sunday. It had 18 international visitors and over 300 local participants every day of its proceedings. One of the remarkable fruits from the festival was the birth of The iREP Report (TiR), an initiative of the journalist, DERIN AJAO and a few of her colleagues including Amarachukwu Iwuala and Titi Olurin with the support of the Goethe Institut. From the second day of the festival, Friday, March 23, the TiR issued a daily review of films shown the previous night. And this contributed to the high intellectual content as well as quality of discourse at the festival. Some of the reviews published by two editions of the Report are hereby excerpted.
THE  keynote address at this year’s IREP international film festival was delivered by Prof. Jean-Paul Colleyn. In his paper, captioned, ‘African Cinemas and the Frontiers of Documentary,’  the anthropologist, filmmaker remarked that there is a fictional dimension to documentary films because for every documentary there are thousands of choices open to the filmmaker. Conversely, he noted that there is a documentary content in fictional films because there is a limit to a filmmaker’s imagination since such  stems from socio-cultural experiences.
Colleyn stated that documentary is a personal treatment of reality and that Nollywood films are not as naïve as many people think they are. This is obvious in Nollywood’s reference to the negative influences of wealth and power on society’s otherwise humane individuals. He rounded off by asserting that fictional films are not opposed to truth.
Acclaimed filmmaker Tunde Kelani, who was one of the panelists that discussed Prof. Colleyn’s paper, believes that Nollywood has the capacity to engage documentary in the development of the industry. Sandra Obiago, another panellist, called for more resources and interest in the production of documentaries, observing that the format provide basis for the younger generation to embark on research on subjects of interest. Director, Producer Teco Benson agreed with Prof. Colleyn that many fictional films are embellished documentaries.
Earlier in his welcome address, the Executive Director of iREP, Femi Odugbemi, emphasised the capability of the documentary film to deepen socio-political experiences. Following the address, four individuals were inducted into the iREP Hall of Fame in recognition of their contributions to the development of documentaries in Nigeria. They include Sandra Mbanefo-Obiago, founding Executive Director of Communicating for Change, whose organisation has produced great documentaries and Cyril Okonkwo, who retired from the Nigerian Television Authority a few years ago after producing critically-acclaimed documentaries. Also honoured were Amb.r Mamman Yusuf, who produced news documentaries that define some of our political landmarks and Francis Olatunji Oladele of Calpeny Films, who is a legendary filmmaker and director of ‘Kongi’s Harvest’ and ‘Things Fall Apart.’
— Amarachukwu Iwuala





A Different African Election
 Directed  and Produced by Jareth and Kevin Merz, An African Election trails the events leading up to the Ghanaian Presidential Election of 2008. John Atta Mills and Nana Akufa-Addo represent the leftist National Democratic Congress (NDC) and the conservative New Patriotic Party (NPP), both men are the top contenders in the race leaving in their trail a number of cameo candidates whose following only matters when the elections land in an inconclusive knot.
The documentary, which opened the list of films screening at iREP 2012, profiles the two leading contestants and all the tactics applied in ensuring the 50 per cent plus one vote necessary to claim victory at the polls.
The title of the documentary hardly needs explaining. Elections in many African countries are plagued by rigging and outright ballot box theft. The Ghanaians however were aiming for an exemplary election that would change the face of what is perceived to be ‘an African election.’
Like some other documentaries screening at the festival, Merz as well employs no voice-over but incorporates short typed messages and commentary from journalists, activists and artists in the documentary’s unfolding.
A brief history of Ghana pre- and post- independence also give a defining background to the documentary, a point echoed by one of the commentators that governance in Ghana is built largely on the country’s history.
As the Ghanaians prepare for the polls, the sense of anger was high plus a general outcry for change, making the election of John Kuffour’s replacement a heated assignment.
The Electoral Chair Kwadwo Afari-Gyan is the documentary’s unlikely hero. Former President Jerry Rawlings could have stolen the show, but Afari-Gyan’s role in stemming the erupting political tension saves the day after a gruelling first round of elections that lands in a run-off. When some strange numbers appear after the run-off, it is the electoral chair, who again resolves the impasse.
An interesting angle to the documentary is the focus on two friends, Kwabena Agyepong and Rojo Mettle. Both support different parties and when the numbers appear to have been tampered with, the vociferous Rojo loudly proclaims that, “Kwabena Agyepong walks into the room and funny things start happening.”
In the ensuing altercations protesting the obvious rigging, someone pointedly states that “This is not Nigeria?!”
Indeed it isn’t and as the Ghanaians finally chose a new president in January of 2008, they had set an example of what influence the voter holds in protecting his vote. To borrow the words of Jerry Rawlings on Atta Mills’ campaign trail, “Protect your ballot boxes the way you would protect and defend your mother!”
If there is no other lesson to be learnt from An African Election, this surely is one.
 —  Aderinsola Ajao





 Meeting Freedom Park
Watching a documentary about Freedom Park in Freedom Park never really seemed a possibility. But with the former colonial prison yard coming full circle to being an event hotspot, this idea no longer seemed out of the ordinary and it came to pass on the opening day of iREP 2012.
At the screening of Femi Odugbemi’s ‘And the Chain Was Not… ’ it was time to appreciate the splendour and the history of what is now Freedom Park. The documentary about the building was not just voice-over and talking heads. An enthralling spoken word performance by Crown Troupe’s Segun Adefila gave life to the struggle of the many former prisoners in what was known as Her Majesty’s Prison.
Swaying and gyrating to the indigenous sounds of the shekere, the omele, the bata and the gangan, as dictated by words from poems by Adefila himself and Oyindamola Olofinlua, the overall production is a wonder to see.   Especially considering it is beyond the story of a transformation from captivity to liberation, but another of the struggle itself and how the bonds are broken for true freedom to be achieved.
According to the film, the prison was initially constructed in 1872 to hold 20 inmates. Made with the best quality building materials imported from Britain, the budget for the prison apparently cost more than the colonial government’s budget for education. While the prison stood, it counted on its inmate list, the likes of Obafemi Awolowo, Herbert Macaulay, labour leader Michael Imoudu and Esther Johnson, who was accused of murdering her lover. The prison even gets worthy mention in Awolowo’s memoirs.
Freedom Park was until some decades ago, one of the least popular historical sites in Lagos. The idea for renovating the former prison ground for recreational purposes was conceived by Theo Lawson, an architect. Now in its newfound glory, the former prison is home to all, but a home most especially for cultural purposes.
In Lawson’s words, the former prison kitchen is now the food court; its execution stand is now a stage for unfettered expression and the former cells themselves are represented across the Park in the flower beds and the pagoda cells. Most interesting however, is the Prison Museum which holds artefacts excavated from the former prison.
And the Chain Was Not is a story of survival and a historical record, however subtle of an aspect of colonialism in Nigeria, particularly the prison system and its subjugation of the rights of local ‘troublemakers.’ That the chains are broken at the end of the documentary and that Freedom Park itself stands today, is testament to what strong will can achieve despite dominating oppression. This is what the director achieves in sharing this story now and for posterity’s sake.
— Aderinsola Ajao





Everybody Gets An Education
Branwen Okpako’s biographic portrait of a friend and fellow filmmaker is the story of another Obama doing great things. The film was the star screening on Day 1 of the 2012 IREP International Documentary Film Festival.
The Education of Auma Obama, is the story of a half-sister to the current President of the United States of America. The story is by itself an intriguing one and Auma is revealed as an intelligent student, mother, youth mentor and social activist. Even before it became fashionable to speak out against foreign aid, the documentary shows her as a strong voice opposing the West over-aiding Africa.
Auma’s story is by extension the story of President Barack Obama. The father they both share comes across as a strong influence on his children, and is himself immortalised in the strides of these two children borne to him by different women.
The film is shot in the run-up to the 2008 US Presidential Elections when much attention is on the trailblazing American Barack Obama and his heritage. One unmissable influence in President Obama’s life becomes obvious: his father. It is the same with Auma. Though she reveals that her parents are not necessarily the best any child can hope for, there is no missing her father’s impact on her life. Her father, a Kenyan public servant was himself the son of a cook, who worked with a family of British settlers. But the older Obama made sure his son received an education that would set him above his peers. Barack soon got a scholarship to study in Harvard; a reward of the cook’s hopes for his son.
In Auma’s family though, the scholarship might not have been a good thing in itself. Barack does not return home alone after completing his study. He comes back with Ruth, an American woman whom he gives the task of looking after his children. Kezia, Auma’s mother is promptly given her marching orders. This is a turning point for the once-outgoing Auma as she dives into her shell and stays there till she herself leaves Kenya to study in Germany.
In portraying the making of Auma Obama, Okpako — herself a female filmmaker — employs many female narrators; perhaps also in a nod to women as oral conveyors of family history. Auma’s female relatives and friends all play prominent roles in analysing and retelling their experiences with Auma.
It is impossible to separate the people in Auma’s life from the making of Auma herself. Okpako draws on excerpts from interviews with former teachers and colleagues as well and as we follow the characters through the 90 minutes, the audience itself receives an education based on Auma’s education.
Okpako’s approach to the story is hardly conventional. She gives the meanings of the names of the different dramatis personae. She employs no voice-over in the narration, leaving the audience to unravel the story and navigate it by itself.
The interesting angle with the names hits home hardest when we find out that Auma’s birth name is actually Rita, which means Pearl. Her mother’s name Kesia means ‘sweet-smelling scent’, highly ironic considering her husband finds her repulsive when he returns with his new wife Ruth, whose name is translated as ‘friend’. The name Barack itself means ‘Blessing’ and Hussein is translated as ‘Handsome Man.’
The Education of Auma Obama is a well-researched effort that should not be watched in a hurry.  What Okpako achieves with it is not another Obama Campaign flick but a story of true grit overcoming the biggest challenges and how our ancestry plays a role in who we are and who we might become.
— Aderinsola Ajao





After Occupy Nigeria, What Next?
Cultural activist, Ben Tomoloju chaired the panel that discussed Democracy, Development and Demonstrations on Day 2 of the IREP Festival. The panellists were filmmakers Charles Novia, Mahmood Ali-Balogun, Musa Abdulahi Sufi, Branwen Okpako and Amb. Mamman Yusuf.
Amb. Yusuf corrected the impression that the pro-fuel subsidy protests roundly tagged ‘Occupy Nigeria’ were the first major protests in the country as was being bandied about during the weeks of te mass actions in January.  He reminded the audience of the June 12 crisis, which he noted was one conflict that threatened the continued existence of Nigeria in a magnitude that is only surpassed by the 1967-70 Civil War. He said it was regretful that because the civil society organisations involved in Occupy Nigeria were an incoherent group, the Federal Government used Labour to hijack the protests.
Abdullahi Sufi was glad that Nigerians set aside their religious and ethnic differences to come together and oppose an unacceptable policy by the government. He recalled how Christians gathered to protect Muslims and vice versa  (as they prayed)  — from attack during the protests  Sufi called for public education to achieve greater success in case such a situation arises in future.
Novia explained that social media were a source of worry to the ruling class during the protests, saying that government will be careful in its future dealings with the populace. He rounded off by describing the current national situation as the calm before the storm.
Ali-Balogun was of the opinion that the fact that the protests were not broadcast on international media was a major setback to the struggle. He blamed those who control international media, who also have vested interests in Nigeria, as being responsible for this seeming blackout. He also expressed dismay over the tribalism, nepotism and other primordial sentiments that hampered the protests.
He reiterated Amb. Yusuf’s opinion, while recalling the late Funmilayo Ransome-Kuti, Moremi and the Aba Women’s riots as ground-shaking symbols of activism that should never be forgotten.
Okpako was displeased that in Germany, for instance, people were more aware of the Boko Haram terrorists than the protests that were ongoing at the time. She advised the audience and by extension, Nigerians to identify what they want to make topical at any point in time.
The session ended with Tomoloju calling for the documentation of information for posterity’s sake, hence the necessity of documentaries.
— Amarachukwu Iwuala





 Building The Nation
In line with the festival’s theme of Africa in Self Conversation: Democracy and Culture, the 2nd IREP festival screened Headlines in History, a documentary about the first 50 years of the Nation Media Group, publishers of East Africa’s most widely-read publication, The Daily Nation. The film recalls how the publishing outfit sustained its ethical journalism and managed to expand its operations across the sub-region despite frustration from government forces and occasional public discontent.
Borne out of a need to provide Kenya’s indigenous population with their own voice in the face of overwhelming colonial censorship, the story of The Nation is itself the story of African independence.
The paper made its debut in 1959 thanks to a chance encounter between a preacher and an activist. A community paper Taifa Leo was acquired and became the Daily Nation. As the years went by, the Daily Nation proved that it was here to stay.
The documentary shows how the newspaper placed itself at the top of news coverage by constantly breaking news ahead of everyone else and having exclusive images of events that heavily influenced Kenyan life and government policy. These included the murders of Tom Mboya and J.M Kariuki, the death of Jomo Kenyatta, Daniel Arap Moi’s swearing-in as president and the Saba Saba protests that ended the one-party system.
In the course of doing their work, staff of the paper suffered multiple arrests and numerous attempts by Moi’s government especially, to silence or weaken this voice of the East African majority. Undeterred, the Nation Media Group spread its wings into Uganda and Tanzania acquiring the Daily Monitor and Mwananchi respectively. They also established a broadcast and media division, diversifying into TV and radio. In 1994, the group also began publishing The East African.
The Nation’s biggest task came however in 2007 during Kenya’s post-election crisis involving President Mwai Kibaki’s supporters and the opposition. Buoyed by its responsibility to its readers, and conscious of the media’s role in society, the Nation joined its voice to brokering peace.
Ending on this note, Headlines in History, is not just the 50-year anniversary of an important publication but a celebration of the important role the press can play in sustaining effective governance.
Echoing this theme was a panel titled ‘Media and Nation Building.’ The panel comprised president of the Nigerian Guild of Editors Gbenga Adefaye; former Managing Editor at NEXT, Kadaria Ahmed; writer Tolu Ogunlesi; performer, culture activist and ex-Deputy Editor of The Guardian,  Ben Tomoloju and Denrele Niyi, Arts Editor of the National Mirror. Lanre Idowu, publisher of Media Review was the moderator.
Tomoloju described the process of nation building as a partnership between the media and the nationalists. This partnership however broke down when the press wanted to properly carry out its duty.  He stressed the importance for the media to understand its role and to do it well, that if a nation is in crisis, the press itself risks becoming an enemy of the people.
For Ogunlesi, the press’ role is a double-edged sword that apart from nation building, also involves some “pulling down.” This call for high ethical standards was a motif in the discussion. Another constant point was the call for innovative approaches to journalism. Emphasised by Ahmed, she said training, improved wages and embracing new media would aid quality journalism.
Ogunlesi raised the issue of how much of his/her proclivities a journalist can bring to their profession at a time of crisis. Other issues that came up at the panel included whether or not the motivation for newspaper ownership is ego-driven or not. Government policy and regulatory laws were also discussed.
According to Adefaye, in recent times, owning a newspaper was motivated by a desire to claim the public space. Ahmed said the influence of the proprietors is itself sometimes unhelpful in the practice of healthy journalism.
Idowu then asked if the advent of social media plays a possible role in this mission and whether the press was to be feared or respected. For Tomoloju, respect is desirable especially regarding being a voice to the voiceless. Adefaye’s response was that, “We should work towards being respected by our readers and feared by the bad boys in our system.”
As part of the self-examination process, the panelists said it is important for the press itself to work within the boundaries of the law, ensure they had their facts right before going to press and develop an overall professional attitude to their work.
It was also an opportunity to sound out their colleagues in the broadcast media to wake up to their responsibility to the audience and try to catch up with the print arm.
Tomoloju rounded off the discussion with the words, “Practice should be in the best of national interest.”
— Aderinsola Ajao





 Africa’s Tech Map
The ICT revolution looming across Africa is the highlight of Michael Grotenhoff’s Linking Africa. From Uganda to Rwanda and then to Kenya, we see how these countries are evolving from largely commodities-based economies to information technology powerhouses.
Mobile Money, a telephone payment option is the sweeping innovation in Uganda, embraced by many but still shunned by some; the software is gradually paying its way into most small and big businesses in the country. Next was Rwanda. Stuck between Uganda and Congo, the agrarian state is on a mission to transform into the region’s biggest ICT pioneer.
A technical partner is South Korea, a country with a similar experience as Rwanda. According to the documentary, Rwanda seeks to establish itself as a link between Uganda, the financial sector and Congo, the home of raw materials.
As the benefits of technological development take root, the running of a fibre optic cable from Kigali through Africa and into Europe sounds like a huge step for the African country.
The film lands finally in Kenya and we meet the inventors of Ushahidi, the now global software that is a consequence of the country’s post election crisis. The software is now widely used as a reporting tool for news and up-to-date sharing of information across global communities. Also in Kenya, we discover the Makerere University’s Computer Science Faculty is churning out thousands of young ICT experts that are ready-made to dominate the sector.
Linking Africa does not show just the major technological strides in these three countries. It follows a Swiss retiree, who restores old computers for the training of youth in Ugandan suburbs. In the absence of constant electricity, he installs a solar-power system for these computers to function.
TRACnet is a medical software developed by a virologist in an AIDS Hospital in Rwanda. This helps him share his patients’ records with hospitals in neighbouring towns and countries. He is also involved in developing techniques that have helped reduce mother to child transmission of the virus.
There is little doubt that all these are not baby steps. Linking Africa shows that the coming years will see Africa as an important global ICT player. To back this point, the documentary featured a female software developer and lecturer at Kenya’s Makerere University, who got a job in an international ICT firm even before the documentary finished shooting.
With the iHub in Kenya poised to be another bright spot on Africa’s tech map, the link between the continent and the world gets stronger with each passing day. You’ll definitely believe this after watching Linking Africa.
 — Aderinsola Ajao





 ...The iREP Workshops
On the second and third days of the film festival, trainings were organised for up-and-coming documentary filmmakers. The facilitators included: Barbel Mauch, a producer from Germany; Alhaji Gboyega Arulogun, documentary filmmaker and TV manager; Cyril Okonkwo, also a docu-mentary filmmaker; Amb. Mamman Yusuf, filmmaker and diplomat; Thomas Plennart and Femi Odugbemi, who are equally documentary filmmakers. The training programmed were: scriptwri-ting, radio documentary, camera work and production.
— Amarachukwu Iwuala





 Rhythms Of Lagos
I don’t want to jive you here tonight. I want to present myself to you as an African...” Fela’s words begin the documentary, ‘Lagos... Notes of a City’. It is indeed fitting as the documentary parodies the everyday experiences of Africans in one of the most populous cities in Africa, Lagos.
Directed by Jens Wenkel, the documentary captures Lagos in its actual sense with its busy streets, heavy traffic and magnetic energy that obviously attracts people from all tribes. It is no wonder then that it is called, ‘no man’s land’.
The vivid portrayal of popular locations in the city and actual lives of people is a powerful aesthetic feature of the film. Mariam, the hausa mother of two, who lives with HIV and Joshua, the security guard, who is optimistic that he will ‘make it’ in Lagos represent throngs of people, who have migrated to this city.
“…in Lagos, there is life,” Mariam says of the city she has come to love, but she warns, “You have to be smart or a two-year old boy will do away with you. That is why they don’t say ‘welcome’, they say, ‘This is Lagos’.” Her experience in Lagos, she says, has made her bolder than she was in the North where she migrated from. Abimbola Philips agrees that life in Lagos is animated. “There’s a lot of energy that is locked up and people want to explore that energy.” She however finds the animation to be “obnoxiously loud and annoying.”
Of interest to the audience is the constant juxtaposition of ideas. Both the charm and the repul-sion of Lagos are well depicted. There is a parallel between the poor and handicapped on the ever boisterous streets of Lagos and the quick switch to the quiet life of Adebanjo, the rich stock broker. Also worthy of note is the sharp contrast between the African shrine and the church scene shown immediately afterwards. This alludes to the general way of life in Lagos.                                                    
  —  Titilayo Olurin





 Remarkable January 25
Remarkable January 25’, one of the films screened at the iREP Festival, is a raw 40-minute film that documents the Egyptian revolution. As its title suggests, the film captures the January 25, 2011 revolution that erupted in Egypt. That day marked a momentous point in the country’s history as people came out in their thousands to protest President Hosni Mubarak’s 30 year autocratic government. Pertinent to the people’s clamor for a change in government is the fact that Mubarak’s government is seen as something so detestable that it is compared to that of a notorious Romanian dictator. “The rule of Mubarak is like the rule of Ceausceascu in Romania,” someone says. The gripping documentary vividly paints a picture of relentless and passionate protesters, who want a change.
As they throng to the Tahrir Square where they call for the resignation of the president, shouts of “freedom” from “oppression” and “corruption” can be heard. “We want freedom, fraternity and equality,” the passion in this protester’s voice is not hard to decipher. One thing is clear from the passion of the protesters; they are unyielding and are prepared to die for their cause. We hear a woman proudly say, “I am a mother of a martyr.”
This is one fascinating feature of the film that we cannot help but notice as it points to the fact that women also join in the struggle. In fact, on one occasion, we see a woman actually lead a protest march.
The protests, which started out as non violent, soon become volatile as the demonstrators are met with hostility from the gov-ernment and even armed forces. Still, they press forward until Mubarak is ousted from power.
However, with the military replacing Mubarak, the January revolution seems only half successful.
The essence of the film though is not to tell us about the success or failure of the revolution but the tenacity behind it. It can therefore be said that the film has the ability to inspire other revolutions for change. The film succeeds in depicting some of the events leading to the revolution through typed messages on the screen. But it could still have done more by giving detailed ac-counts of the events that stirred up the revo-lution.
— Titilayo Olurin

www.irepfilmfestival.com 3 Oguntona Crescent, Gbagada Phase 1, Lagos Nigeria. P.O. Box 36 Surulere. T: +234 803 425 1963, +234 802 201 6495, +234 803 403 0646 E: info@irepfilmfestival.com

Nollywood Videofilms, Cinema And The Frontiers Of Documentary



THE GUARDIAN on SUNDAY, 25 MARCH 2012 00:00 PROF JEAN-PAUL COLLYEN SUNDAY MAGAZINE ARTS
prof-jean-paul-colleyn
(Being Keynote delivered by PROF JEAN-PAUL COLLYEN, director of the Centre For African Studies, Paris, at the formal opening of the iREP International Documentary Film Festival)
TALKING of Nollywood, I shall only deal here of English speaking (Igbo) Videofilms.  I shall not speak about Yoruba or Hausa videofilms, which, of course are also very important.  I got interested in these works through an experience I had in Accra. I was staying in Manthia Diawara’s house with another filmmaker coming from Senegal, Ben Dioganbey. Manthia, who is a famous Malian writer and moviemaker, was, at the time, teaching in the New York University center in Accra. I gave, myself, some classes, there.
As, in Accra, at the time,  the temperature was very high, we could not really go to bed early and we were watching Africa cable, A South African TV channel that was broadcasting Nigerian films endlessly. Some of those films were of poor quality, but others were really interesting and we ended by knowing the names of the directors and of the actors. We started to develop a real taste for the genre. I shall advocate the idea today that Nollywood films tell a lot about social life in Lagos, about Nigeria, about Africa and about humanity in general. But first, I would like to make a point on the terms “fiction” and “documentary”.
What is fiction? The word has two meanings.
In the first sense, a fiction can be defined as the result of a fabrication. A fiction is a story that has been forged. In this sense, any film is a fiction and documentaries are fiction as well. Why? Because a documentary is necessarily made by an author. “Camera do not take picture”, as somebody said. Even if the author – the director – makes a special effort to be neutral, there is nothing like real objectivity in the course of the exercise. The documentary film will always reflect not the reality itself, but the real as it is seen by the filmmaker. Documentary shooting and editing is a creative process that require hundreds of choices.  So a documentary is unavoidably also a fiction in this first sense of the word.
But the word “fiction” has a second meaning that is more frequent. A fiction is a story that is the “pure” product of imagination. The facts never happened historically. But the problem is that there is no “pure” imagination. An author or a fiction film director finds his imagination in the real world. He is always borrowing the facts from the social life, from the outside world. In that sense, fiction films are also documentaries. Nowadays, as very few people are as naïve as to know exactly what is the “real” and as many people know that part of the real is not visible, more and more artists are playing with the two meanings of fiction and exploit the blurring of the boundaries.  The strength of Nollywood videofilms rests on the fact that they are very close to what people think, live or dream of, so that they convey a lot of information and have a documentary dimension.
The nineties was the time of Nigerian videographers in a context characterized by the failure of State policy and of development programs orchestrated by international institutions.
Private producers emerge, most of the time not coming from film schools. They wanted to sell a product that they could sell and ended by producing cheap VCD that many people could by and see at home. In their desire to offer to the people want they want, they have overtaken the paternalist cinema of the colonial and postcolonial time. Nigerian videos are entirely produced and distributed outside international, the pan-African the state institutions that are shaping most of the African celluloid cinema. Rapidly, the popular VCD found a public and created a still larger audience; an audience that had grown up saturated by American and European culture industry through TV spectatorship.  The Western series, already paid and refunded several times on the Western market, used to make a second life through a sort of dumping in the Third World. So, the success of videofilms was not guaranteed: they had serious competitors but they won.

The Nigerian Videofilms are an example of popular culture, in contrast to mass culture produced by large scale industries, mainly in the West. They are not keyed to political or cultural preoccupations of European or American commissioners. They offer an image of Africa from within. Nevertheless, they are not local; they also reflect the effects of globalization, showing many people travelling in the world. They also illustrate eloquently what Karl Marx called the commodification fetishism, exhibiting object of desire such as prestigious cars, luxurious mansion, draped curtains, large screen TV sets, Western outfits, and a lot of prestigious international labels.
The consumerist desire of African audience —  a majority of poor people —  is literally devoured by the products and symbols offered by a borderless capitalism. As you know ultra modernity today in economy is to produce goods in China with very low wages guaranteed by a repressive communist party, to sell first on the rich markets in developed countries, the surplus going to the countries of the so-called Third World; a very lucrative triangular trade system. But Nollywood videos broke the rules: instead of seeing buying Chinese karate films, Indian melodramas or Dallas or Dynasty TV series, they started selling very well in the local markets of Nigerian and Ghanaian cities as in the diaspora.
The reason of this success rests on the fact that this video small scale industry draws inspiration from the social life and feeds the urban imaginaire.The videofilms dive in on the desires and anxieties of ordinary people, so that producers,  directors and actors can certainly be seen as mediators of popular views.
This industry is now part of the public sphere which emerged in the 1990 years, after the liberalization and the commercialization of the medias, in a context of State institutions failure. Nollywood videos are often accused to alienate a passive mass audience in the frame of what has been called escapism. I shall try to show here that is not so simple and that those videos make people think and brings information about the real world. On this new artistic stage, new figures emerged. First the prosperous business men, successful in liberal economy and global trade, often act at the edge of illegality. But this new figure is as criticized as it is praised. Vidofilms are not only a sort of glass case for icons of pride like fenced mansion in residential areas, elegant African and Western outfits, and Mercedes Benz or Four-Wheel-Drive cars. Power and success are often presented as being achieved by violence, meanness and engagement with occult powers. Many films depict how people get power and money through a pact with occult powers and ritual murders. They are sometimes looked down by the elite as “juju films”, but they indeed tell something about popular psychology. Most of the films convey a complex or even ambiguous message. Of course, they show a way of life made of success and luxury, but most of the time the good Christian businessman ends being corrupted by his own power and his own money. There is always a hard struggle between ethical qualities and the temptations of a corrupted world. Films about occult forces problematize the immoral acquisition of money and power. The spectra of ultimate selfishness which belongs to a particular occult economy in which human life is perversely used for making money equates  symbolically a political critique of the hegemonic power of finance in a time where liberal economy has kicked out of the horizon, the single idea of humanity and solidarity.

Another genre is the family drama. Family dramas focus on the seductions following high social status. Here again power and money seem to be hailed, but most of the time the scenario is based on a rise and fall pattern. An important point is raised: how to attain this high status by correct means and not to lose it through lack of self-control. Here another figure comes in: the Pentecostal pastor. He also is driving a Mercedes, but he gives an example of the Prosperity Gospel preached by the increasingly popular Pentecostal-charismatic churches. God will bless with prosperity for those who believe in him and keep on praying. Pentecostalism demonizes ethnic traditions and preaches for a complete break with the past. It is at least what they pretend because by affirming that God is stronger than Satan, they perpetuate the beliefs in Satan. To exist, they need the beliefs in the Power of Darkness. Many videofilm producers have adopted Pentecostal forms of representation, which are indeed very popular. Taking up the views and concerns of Pentecostal-charismatic churches, the videofilm industry contributes to the emergence of a new public culture.
Another topic exploited by the videofilms is the gender question, as the majority of the audience is composed by women. Here again, many critiques have presented the videofilms as being male chauvinist. Some are, but the generalization is unfair. Some women a portrayed as very powerful and not so much submitted to the arbitrary and brutal power of their husbands. Female strong characters are praised, but excesses are also denounced, like, for instance, loose girls searching for quick money. Those girls or women make use of witchcraft or “love magic” obtained through an alliance with “traditional priest from the bush”. The gender relations are also marked by problems of filiation, pregnancy and abortion.
A recurrent theme is the problem of reproduction – a problem the mother-in-law boldly attributes to the wife without any medical evidence. Many times, the husband ends up sleeping with the wrong woman (a witch). The wife, by contrast, attends a Pentecostal church and gets spiritual support from her pastor and prayer group. Sometimes, the redemption takes the form of a baby.
The figure of the mother who controls her married son and renders the young wife impossible is more than often satirized.
Let us take another example where the way a problem is presented help people to think about it: the emergence of squads which have been called the Bakassi boys, self defense squads against armed robbers.  Those boys are not simply represented – at least in some videos - as super heroes. Of course the films sympathize with the despair of many citizens to be attacked by armed robbers and to be deprived of any police protection. But several films show also how volunteers of those squads take advantage of their new position and become corrupt and abusive themselves.

Another critique against Nollywood films addresses the cinematic language. Of course many videos are of pour quality, but this quality is improving as people are using a try and fail process. Directors, editors and actors learn their job on the spot although they try to keep the production cost low in order to sell at an acceptable price for a mass audience. Of course the cinematic language is not the one that is taught in sophisticated film schools: the narration (the story) is blended with a fragmentation of images propounded by clips, advertising and TV. One day, I asked to a producer why in his film the sound quality was so bad that I thought people would not understand part of the speeches. He abruptly answered that as far as he knew people understood enough. I do not know who was right.

I HOPE that through the few examples that I have presented, you understand the relations between Nollywood videos and documentary. Being in the center of many discussions in town, these videofilms could be regarded as ways to talk about things, and to generate more talk. They offer a particular discourse to address matters of concern in everyday life.
You could argue that they are not realist, not even plausible. Let us consider the visualization of the supposed invisible powers, Mami Wata or evil spirits. Nigerian films transgress the codes of realism, making concrete suggestion about the nexus of occultism and crime. Some anthropologists have studied this symbolic pattern at the level of the state power. I think about Comaroff in South Africa, Joseph Tonda in Congo, Peter Geshiere and Jean-Pierre Warnier in Cameroon. The fact is that evil powers are in the very center of modernity, not in the margins as traces of a timeless African heritage. The popular beliefs as they are represented in videofilms get close to the left critique of the perverse effect of globalization.
Globalization not so much entails sharing in humanism: it is woven into world system of oppression and social destruction. It would be exaggerated to credit videofilms of a political agenda, but they certainly play an important role in the ongoing public debates about the (im) morality and legitimacy of power, good governance and citizenship.  Important because they use an expression very different from the obsolete Marxist ideology or from the disenchanted language of social sciences.
That brings me to my second argument that will also be my conclusion. I think that in this country there is a huge potential for a new style of documentary. I think that using the tools of Nollywood, very interesting documentaries (there probably exist some that I do not know) could be made by young filmmaker committed to the idea of democracy and interested in social issue. This potential as a dramatic dimension as many people in Lagos live in their live the most dramatic scenario. If cheap video documentaries were good enough to touch a large audience, a brilliant future would be open for a new generation of documentarists. Even if you want ultimately to make fiction film, you can be acknowledged through an interesting documentary. Many famous filmmaker were known because they sent their first film to a festival or a public screening somewhere and were noticed by other professional. It needs some efforts, but a documentary is not so expensive to produce as fiction part and if it does not make money, the loss is not so big. In order to achieve this project, young directors need to use the same intelligence as Nollywood directors: to use their friends, their relatives, their social connections and think first of all to be as closed as possible to the people they want to reach. Another opportunity is to mix the two different genres: building scenario from the real lives, then shoot the film as a Nollywood film.




www.irepfilmfestival.com 3 Oguntona Crescent, Gbagada Phase 1, Lagos Nigeria. P.O. Box 36 Surulere. T: +234 803 425 1963, +234 802 201 6495, +234 803 403 0646 E: info@irepfilmfestival.com

Africa Needs To Deeply Engage Documentary Format In Telling Its Story


THE GUARDIAN on SUNDAY, 25 MARCH 2012 00:00 FEMI ODUGBEMI SUNDAY MAGAZINEARTS

femi-odubemi
(Being the welcome address by  FEMI ODUGBEMI, Executive Director of the iREPRESENT Documentary Film Festival, 2012 at the opening of the festival at the on Thursday March 22, 2012 Terra Kulture, VI, Lagos)
 WELCOME to the second edition of the IREPRESENT INTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY FILM FESTIVAL, aka iREP DOCU-FEST.  We are dedicated to promoting awareness about the power of documentary films to deepen our shared experiences, especially in the areas of social and cultural education and as well as give voice to the African experience globally.
It’s been an interesting experience since our maiden edition. Since last year, we have tried to sustain the energy with our monthly film screening programme in partnership with Freedom Park and Goethe Institut and the Nigerian Film Corporation. We have also since then held a very successful training programme on Scriptwriting for Non-Fiction and Fictional films in partnership with the Public Affairs section of the US Embassy. We believe we are beginning to build a critical mass of viewers and filmmakers who are finding that the power to understand and define their personal journeys as Africans, as Nigerians can find expression in this artform.
This year, the festival is based on the framework: Africa In Self-Conversation and it would explore the theme: Democracy and Culture — The Documentary Film Intervention.
It is a theme inspired by our experience in Nigeria in January this year when the issue of the removal of oil subsidy snowballed into an important “self-conversation” about integrity in government and about the value of our participatory democracy. The vehicle for that self-conversation was driven by the mass exchange of information and perspectives via documentary videos on Youtube and the social media platforms on the Internet.
The conversations were intense and defining, especially in its interrogations of the value of democracy to development. The political culture of Africa and the world is rapidly changing and African filmmakers have a unique opportunity to define its impact through the power of their images. Today documentary filmmaking is more important than ever.
The scope of the Festival would cover such areas as Democracy and Demonstrations, New media technology and participatory democracy, and the potentials of the Nigerian film industry ‘Nollywood’ to understand the value and meaning of their images in the context of the fictional stories told. Culture is no longer a sub-theme in the politics of the global information order. It is the basis of it.
We have this sub-theme asking the provocative question: ‘Is Nollywood Documentary?’ It is for a specific reason. It is meant to interrogate an important proposition which averses that an African filmmaker has unusual responsibility in his imagery, beyond mere entertainment; he has the responsibility of the “cultural representation” in his work – irrespective of whether that film is fiction or non-fiction, because the representation of the African experience has always suffered from the fact that it has been subjected to interpretations by people outside of the experience. It has become imperative for African filmmakers to understand that the images in their narrative have much more power than that of entertainment. Nollywood is powerful today – it has become much more than a film industry for entertainment, it has become more or less the representation of the African experience in many parts of the world and it is becoming the image template for defining what Africa looks like, how we speak, dress and the values that we uphold. So we feel Filmmakers in Nigeria especially in Nollywood need that conversation and that understanding that we allow them to begin to take that responsibility seriously.
 For us, it is not about iREP trying to recruit Nollywood filmmakers to do Documentaries, though we feel with better understanding more of that will happen, it is about creating a timely conversation on how powerful images are in a world that is globalised. If we say we want to change the narrative of Africa, if we say we want Africa to be empowered economically and politically, it is critical for us to begin to manage the images of Africa that subsist in the global information order, from that of poverty and pain and disease and war to one that begins to speak and showcase inspirational breakthroughs, inspirational people and achievements. Africa has a lot to teach the world. The  values of Africa are important to the world, in spirituality, in community, values of integrity and honesty that are embedded in our culture. The only way we can do that, our biggest weapon  FOR this contribution is film.
We are very happy to welcome to this conversation very exciting thinkers and filmmakers who we know will make this festival memorable. Thank you for coming Professor Jean Paul Colleyn, Director of Institute of African Studies, Paris. He is an Anthropologist, Filmmaker and Scholar and a wonderful gentleman.
I want to say a special Welcome to our friends from AG DOK — Association of Independent Producers in Germany, and APIC — Association of  Independent Filmmakers, Cameroun. Our partnership with the Goethe Institut is forging a collaborative conversation. Later today in a Producers’ Roundtable that we hope will enlarge and enrich the possibilities of filmmaker-to-filmmaker cooperations. A special welcome home to our ‘son’ of the soil Branwen Okpako. And to Katarina Hedren of Democratic Network Africa; thank you for staying back from MOKOLO to contribute to IREP.
And welcome our brothers from the Northern arm of our film industry – Mikail, Nasiru and Musa. Specially,  we thank the Director of the Goethe Institut, Kano, Frank Roger for facilitating the participation of our brothers from Kannywood.
We specially welcome the recipients of this year’s iREP Hall of FAME AWARD – Cyril, Sandra, Yussuf and Francis. You richly deserve more than the modest applause we are giving you today.
I want to say a special thank you and well done to Marc-Andre and to Barbel for making it possible to screen some the very exciting films we have lined up. Thank you.
We hope hat this relationship will be mutually beneficial to us all.
We hope all our visitors will enjoy the interaction with our local industry and their “encounter” with our beautiful city of Lagos. And we hope at the end of the 4-day event we all would have moved even further to a fuller understanding of Documentaries as an important artform to defining our selfs, our culture, our aspiration as a community and our place in the world.


www.irepfilmfestival.com 3 Oguntona Crescent, Gbagada Phase 1, Lagos Nigeria. P.O. Box 36 Surulere. T: +234 803 425 1963, +234 802 201 6495, +234 803 403 0646 E: info@irepfilmfestival.com